Being blind

I was reading the news about Caster Sememya to run again in women's international track events. She was the woman who swept several sprints in Berlin last summer, winning by more than 2 seconds in some races, dominating the competition. It was then the other women competitors voiced their view that "she" wasn't just a woman. You can search the news stories over the last year to see the various views athletes and the media have taken with her.

I haven't changed my view of the situation then, because the South African doctor who examined her before her departure from Berlin advised the South African Athletic Association not to send her as she wasn't the women she appeared to be and any gender test would show the truth about her. But she went and the controversy began.

But that's not my argument anymore. It's that the transcommunity has not changed their view that she had the right then and more so now to compete as she is and not have to undergo any medical treatments required of transgender athletes to compete fairly with the other athletes. They still keep arguing the other athletes, the atheletic community and the athletic organization simply have to accept her rights.

My argument is that for the sake of one, who clearly demonstrated some unusual advantage, everyone else has no right to contest her rights. The individual is more than the whole. They argue this applies to all transgender people, but more so in some cases where it's clearly and obviously misplaced at best and wrong at worst.

The are simply blind to the reality of the whole. They assume all transgender people have the disadvantage and deserve advantages wherever they can get them. Except that Caster wasn't wholy born female but, as some sources have reported, some form of intersexed, probably mild to moderate AIS, meaning a male with the appearance of female gentalia, but no female reproductive system.

She may think of yourself as a girl (gender identity), raised a girl and accepted as a girl, but it doesn't make her female, and enough to compete with other women. But that doesn't seem to bother the transcommunity. They prefer blindness to reality and understanding. They prefer to discriminate against other women than acknowledge they may be wrong. They prefer to simply deny the truth.

The truth other sports have proceedures for transgender athletes to compete on par with their other same gender athletes and all have complied to compete, taking the mandatory two-plus years to transistion. That's what Caster should have done and what the IAAF should have mandated, striping her of her medals, records, and rights to compete until she complies.

But she didn't and screamed discrimination. And the transcommunity screamed with her. And those who voiced support for the other women, they were verbally pummelled into silence. They not only didn't want to hear the truth, they wanted their truth to be right. Except it wasn't right or fair.

And now after nearly a year from the events in Berlin and Caster is allowed back, they're arguing they were right all along, except it's clear between the lines in the news, Caster did undergo some medical treatments and proceedures to comply with the IAAF's rules for transgender athletes. Something she should have done then.

Being blind has some advantages, as we know. We can deny the truth and reality and only see our view as right and fair. And in doing so with Caster and against everyone else the transcommunity showed their colors, or rather their inability to see the color, only their black and white world, except everything and everyone else is black.

And only then do we see the transcommunity's self-righteousness and self-serving blindness. Sadly too, because it only adds to those who do help and support transgender people and the transcommunity to winch and balk. And then walk away, in their forced silence. Being blind not only hurts yourself, it hurts others who want to care, only to be rejected by not being blind.

The Case of Caster Part II

Well, she's back, and the controversy didn't go away and only is the rhetoric on both sides heating up. But what is added to the mix is more obvious the motive of the South African Athletic Association (SAA). According the news, she "completed" the regimen the IAAF prescribed, except it wasn't said what that was.

Going back to last year, what we know or really heard was that she had her undescended testes and no female reproductive system. Over this last year, according to the IAAF and the SAA, she had those removed and supposedly followed a regimen of hormone replacement therapy (HRT). And the SAA said, "trust us." And she didn't have to go through the two years of HRT transgender althletes are required to complete before competing again.

Except at her recent track event she blew the field away. Granted her time was considerably slower than last year and far from any world record, it was still evident that her (former?) male body is still there and the (HRT) didn't seem to work or maybe not even followed. At this point it's clear while she still thinks she's a woman (for her gender) and wants to compete as a woman, she is still mostly male.

Her advantage is that any male athlete who matures will be physically stronger (and probably faster and quicker) than comparable being and maturing female. And if she had undergone HRT, there would be significant physical changes, even for an extreme athlete. That's not evident in the video I saw of her recent races. She wasn't at her peak, and has a lot of room to improve before more imporatant events his year and next.

In other international sports, any male to female transistion for an athletes would undergo two years of HRT, so why was she allowed to return after a year? The reason is that two years would have probably wiped out her chance to be competitive. But what if she wasn't under HRT for the year? Then aside from natural reduction of testosterone, she wouldn't be much different which training could easily make up.

The is because HRT is part anti-androgen and at proper levels reduces testosterone to within the more normal range for genetic women, not at the high level bordering on low male levels. Those levels indicates the HRT was too low or not followed. Even Kristy Worley has it wrong saying Caster has congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) when she has no female reproductive system to have this condition, according the doctor who originally examined her and recommended she not go to Berlin last year.

But in reality, this isn't about her but winning. She wants to win no matter what, and if she has a physical advantage of her birth and maturity (as male), then so what. Her country wants to win. So, that's what it's really about, medals and records, and having South Africa get the recognition. She's not a pawn anymore and it's clear she doesn't care about honesty and fairness, other words she would set the record straight for all to know and prove us wrong.

But I haven't heard that, nor do I expect, except in the future when the truth is finally known and will be too late to retract the awards and records. I would like to be wrong, and the information isn't complete to know for sure, but what does exists from reliable sources tilts against her. She can let the world know, so what's the problem since it's already a public issue?

I think if she continues to win with significant margins over longtime women athletes, then the questions will continues with more fervor and the other female athletes will have a case to make to make her case public so everyone understands. As I said last year, she stepped into the spotlight, so silence isn't an answer. And as I said last year, the IAAF really screwed up, but they will have to face the music of her competition if she continues winning.

She came out of nowhere to win big and was obviously male. That hasn't changed, which means the controversy hasn't changed, along with everyone's opinion. Anyway, that's my opinion to date, and as always, subject to change with the truth and reality.